As a behavior consultant with a trauma-informed approach, my utmost priority is the well-being and emotional welfare of the animals under my care. This commitment extends to the methods and tools I employ in my practice. While head halters have gained popularity among trainers and pet owners, I never incorporated them into my work. This choice is based on an understanding of the risks and disadvantages associated with this particular tool as elucidated by several colleagues and scientific research.

Potential Misuse;

Head halters are often mistakenly perceived as muzzles, which can result in reactions from the public. Such misconceptions can create stress for both the dog and its owner. Furthermore, without training and comprehension of how to use this tool, here is a risk of unintentional harm or discomfort being caused to the dog.

A study conducted at Myerscough College used thermal imaging to assess stress levels in dogs wearing head collars compared to harnesses. This study found a significant decrease in ear temperature, indicative of stress when dogs wore head collars. Additionally, behaviors such as lip-licking, yawning, and attempts to remove the head collar, commonly recognized as signs of stress and discomfort, were more frequently observed in dogs wearing head collars compared to harnesses. This suggests that head collars can cause discomfort and stress, potentially compromising the welfare of the dog​​.

Risk of Injury;

The design of head halters exerts pressure on a dogs neck and spine, potentially leading to injury.

If a dog suddenly lunges or is pulled, it can cause injuries such as whiplash, strained muscles, or even damage to the spine. As someone who values the well-being of animals, I find this risk unacceptable. A recent study on the use of head-halters on horses concluded. “…This observation is also consistent with the fact that leather headcollars were reported to have a lower injury rate compared with synthetic or webbing headcollars. Headcollar-related injuries to horses could be expected to fall into several categories, including pressure-induced lesions of superficial anatomical structures, traumatic injuries to deeper structures, injuries to the neck distal to the attachment of the headcollar and other injuries potentially as a result of horses falling. The true incidence of such injuries is unknown, as they are rarely reported and are often suspected rather than observed.…” Marlin et al.2021

Emotional Well-being;

An essential aspect of providing trauma-informed care is respecting the experiences of animals. Many dogs feel uncomfortable and averse to head halters. This discomfort can create associations with walks or training sessions, which can undermine the trust between a dog and their handler. update: according to simpawtico

Short Term Solution;

While head halters may offer control over a dogs movements, they fail to address behavioral issues. Relying solely on a head halter can lead to dependence on this tool, preventing the dog from learning self-control skills. As a behavior consultant, my focus lies in achieving long term change rather than relying on temporary fixes.

Alternative Tools Available;

It's suggested that alternatives like front clip harnesses can provide control without the risks associated with head halters. These harnesses are generally considered more comfortable for dogs and less likely to cause stress or discomfort​.

After considering and understanding these options, I can offer solutions that prioritize the dog's emotional health.

To sum up, although head halters may be effective, I believe the potential risks and drawbacks outweigh the benefits for some situations. As a professional committed to Do No Harm and trauma-informed care, it is important for me to prioritize the well-being of the animals I work with. This means selecting tools and techniques that are safe, respectful, and aligned with reinforcement and trust-building principles. Considering its risks and potential for misuse, I have decided not to incorporate the use of head halters in my practice.

Marlin, D. J., Pickles, K., Godoy, R. F. d., & Williams, J. (2021). Opening forces or failure of commercially available equine headcollars and other safety devices. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part P: Journal of Sports Engineering and Technology, 237(3), 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/17543371211039610CARTER, A., MCNALLY, D. and ROSHIER, A. (2020) Canine collars: an investigation of collar type and the forces applied to a simulated neck model. Veterinary Record.
GRAINGER, J., WILLS, A.P. and MONTROSE, V.T. (2016) The behavioural effects of walking on a collar and harness in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Veterinary Behavior, 14, 60-64.
HAUG, L.I., BEAVER, B.V., LONGNECKER, M.T. (2002) Comparison of dogs’ reactions to four different head collars. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 79, 53-61.
OGBURN, P., CROUSE, S., MARTIN, F. and HOUPT, K. (1998) Comparison of behavioural and physiological responses of dogs wearing two different types of collars. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 61, 133-142.